Accounts and their epistemic implications

An investigation of how ‘I don’t know’ answers by children are received in trauma recovery talk

Authors

  • Joyce Lamerichs VU University
  • Eva Alisic University of Melbourne
  • Marca Schasfoort VU University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.35244

Keywords:

children, I don't know answers, trauma recovery talk, accounts, remembering, conversation analysis, competence

Abstract

We examine how “I don’t know” answers provided by children in psychological research interviews on trauma recovery talk are received. We analyse the two main ways in which these answers are taken up by the psychologist. Both are hearable as offering an account for the child, but carry different implications. Where the first account claims access to what can legitimately be remembered, the second steers away from this ‘sensitive’ epistemic course by accounting for the question the interviewer asked. The first strategy results in qualifying responses from the child and the second strategy invites more elaborate replies from the child on what happened. Exploring these practices demonstrates how children display their social competence in this delicate interview setting.

Author Biographies

  • Joyce Lamerichs, VU University

    Joyce Lamerichs is assistant professor at the Department of Language, Literature and Communication in the Faculty of Humanities, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. She conducts funded and unfunded research using interactive approaches informed by conversation analysis and discursive psychology in different institutional contexts that deal with (mental) health concerns of young children and adolescents. She also teaches courses in conversation analysis at BA, MA level and postgraduate level. 

  • Eva Alisic, University of Melbourne

    Eva Alisic is associate professor of child trauma and recovery at the University of Melbourne. She also conducts research into how children and families cope with traumatic events such as disaster and violence, and works with policy makers and clinicians to translate research findings into practice.

  • Marca Schasfoort, VU University

    Marca Schasfoort is a university teacher at the Department of Language, Literature and Communication in the Faculty of Humanities, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, where she teaches (applied) conversation analysis at BA and MA level. She also is an experienced trainer.

References

Alisic, E., Boeije, H. R., Jongmans, M. J. & Kleber, R. J. (2011). Children’s perspectives on dealing with traumatic events. Journal of Loss and Trauma: International Perspectives on Stress and Coping, 16(6), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2011.576979

Antaki, C. (2002). Personalized revision of ‘failed’ questions. Discourse Studies, 4(4), 411–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445602004004022

Aronsson, K. & Hundeide, K. (2002). Relational rationality and children’s inter­view responses. Human Development, 45, 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1159/
000057073

Bateman, A. & Danby, S. (2013). Recovering from the earthquake: Early childhood teachers and children collaboratively telling stories about their experiences. Disaster Prevention and Management, 22 (5), 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-10-2013-0177

Betz, E. (2015). Indexing epistemic access through different confirmation formats: Uses of responsive (das) stimmt in German interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 87, 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.018

Boyd, E. & Heritage, J. (2006). Taking the history: Questioning during comprehensive history taking. In J. Heritage & D. W. Maynard (eds), Communication in Medical Care (pp. 151–184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607172.008

Brady, G., Lowe, P. & Olin Lauritzen, S. (2015). Connecting a sociology of child­hood perspective with the study of child health, illness and well-being: Intro­duction. Sociology of Health and Illness, 37(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12260

Butler, C. & Weatherall, A. (2006). ‘No, we’re not playing families’: Membership categorization in childrens’ play. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(4), 441–470. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_4

Clemente, I. (2009). Progressivity and participation: Children’s management of parental assistance in paediatric chronic pain encounters. Sociology of Health and Illness, 31(6), 872–888. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01156.x

Danby, S., Butler, C. & Emmison, M. (2011). ‘Have you talked with a teacher yet?’ How helpline counsellors support young callers being bullied at school. Children and Society, 25, 328–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2011.00379.x

Drew, P. (1992). Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds), Talk at work (pp. 470–520). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.

Edwards, D. & Fasulo, A. (2006). ‘To be honest’: Sequential uses of honesty phrases in talk-in-interaction. Research on Language and Interaction, 39 (4), 343–376. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_1

Fogarty, K., Augoustinos, M. & Kettler, L. (2013). Re-thinking rapport through the lens of progressivity in investigative interviews into child sexual abuse. Discourse Studies, 15(4), 395–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613482429

Freed, A. F. & Ehrlich, S. (eds) (2010). ‘Why do you ask?’ The function of questions in institutional discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hepburn, A. & Bolden, G. (2013). The conversation analytic approach to transcription. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (eds), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp.57–76). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Heritage, J. (2010). Questioning in medicine. In A. F. Freed & S. Ehrlich (eds), ‘Why do you ask?’ The function of questions in institutional discourse (pp.42–68). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Heritage, J. (2012). The epistemic engine: Sequences organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685

Heritage, J. & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103

Hutchby, I. (2002). Resisting the incitement to talk in child counselling: Aspects of the utterance ‘I don’t know’. Discourse Studies, 4, 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456020040020201

Hutchby, I. (2007). The discourse of child counselling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.21

Hutchby, I. & O’Reilly, M. (2010). Children’s participation and the familial moral order in family therapy. Discourse Studies, 12(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609357406

Iversen, C. (2012). Recordability: Resistance and collusion in psychometric inter­views with children. Discourse Studies, 14(6), 69–709. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612456997

Iversen, C. (2014). ‘I don’t know if I should believe him’: Knowledge and believability in interviews with children. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12028

Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp.13–31). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef

Jenkins, L. (2015). Negotiating pain: The joint construction of a child’s bodily sensations. Sociology of Health and Illness, 37(2), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12207

Jol, G. & Stommel, W. (2016). Resisting the legitimacy of the question: Self-evident answers to questions about sources of knowledge in police interviews with child witnesses. International Journal of Legal Discourse, 1(2), 345–374. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2016-0014

Jol, G. & van der Houwen, F. (2014). Police interviews with child witnesses: Pursuing a response with but-prefaced questions. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 21(1), 113–138.

Keevallik, L. (2011). The terms of not knowing. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada & J. Steensig (eds), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 184–206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.009

Labov, W. & Fanshell, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press.

Lamerichs, J., Alisic, E. & Schasfoort, M. (2015). ‘You just have to be cheerful really’: Children’s accounts of ordinariness in trauma recovery talk. In M. O’Reilly & J. N. Lester (eds), The Palgrave handbook of child mental health: Discourse and conversation studies (pp. 618–635). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137428318_33

Lee, S. & Tanaka, H. (2016). Affiliation and alignment in responding actions. Journal of Pragmatics, 100, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.05.008

Lindström, J. & Karlsson, S. (2016). Tensions in the epistemic domain and claims of no-knowledge: A study of Swedish medical interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 106, 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.003

Moran-Ellis, J. (2010). Reflections on the sociology of childhood in the UK. Current Sociology, 58(2), 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392109354241

Muntigl, P. & Choi, K. T. (2010). Not remembering as a practical epistemic resource in couple’s therapy. Discourse Studies, 12(3), 331–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609358516

O’Reilly, M. (2008). What value is there in children’s talk? Investigating family therapists’ interruptions of parents and children during the therapeutic process. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(3), 507–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.005

O’Reilly, M., Karim, K. & Kiyimba, N. (2015). Question use in child mental health assessments and the challenges of listening to families. British Journal of Psychiatry Open, 1(2), 116–120. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.001503

O’Reilly, M., Lester, J. N. & Muskett, T. (2016). Children’s claims to knowledge regarding their mental health experiences and practitioner’ negotiation of the problem. Patient Education and Counseling, 99, 905–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.005

Pomerantz, A. (1988). Offering a candidate answer: An information seeking strategy. Communication Monographs, 55, 360–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758809376177

Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality. London: Sage.

Puchta, C. & Potter, J. (2004). Focus group practice. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209168

Silverman, D. & Peräkylä, A. (1990). AIDS counselling: The interactional organisation of talk about ‘delicate’ issues. Sociology of Health and Illness, 12 (3), 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347251

Steensig, J. & Drew, P. (2008). Introduction: Questioning and affiliation/dis­affiliation in interaction. Discourse Studies, 10(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607085581

Stivers, T. & Hayashi, M. (2010). Transformative answers: One way to resist a question’s constraints. Language in Society, 39, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404509990637

Stivers, T. & Robinson, J. D. (2006). A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, 35(3), 367–392. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060179

Van Nijnatten, C. (2013). Downgrading as a counterstrategy: A case study in child welfare. Child and Family Social Work, 18, 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00809.x

Weatherall, A. (2011). ‘I don’t know’ as a prepositioned epistemic hedge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44(4), 317–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2011.619310

Weiste, E., Voutilainen, L. & Peräkylä, A. (2016). Epistemic asymmetries in psychotherapy interaction: Therapists’ practices for displaying access to clients’ inner experiences. Sociology of Health and Illness, 38(4), 645–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12384

Wootton, A. (2006). Children’s practices and their connections with mind. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059567

Published

2018-08-03

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Lamerichs, J., Alisic, E., & Schasfoort, M. (2018). Accounts and their epistemic implications: An investigation of how ‘I don’t know’ answers by children are received in trauma recovery talk. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 2(1), 25-48. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.35244

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >>