Imitation in children’s locomotor play
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.36016Keywords:
children play, multimodality, imitationAbstract
Children commonly engage in social locomotor play—the horsing around, running about, and physical contact characteristic of playgrounds and neighborhood streets. To adults and outsiders, this activity may look like undisciplined chaos. However, the very recognizabilitly of locomotor play—the fact that children observably pull it off together as a discriminate activity—points to a set of shared practices for its accomplishment. In this article, we investigate children’s methods and resources for organizing social locomotor play. Using video recordings of 5-6yo children playing during an immersive technologically-mediated science lesson, our analysis shows in fine detail some of the orderliness of social locomotor play. In particular, we demonstrate how children use imitation to organize the initiation and progression of this activity.
References
Björk-Willén, P. (2007). Participation in multilingual preschool play: Shadowing and crossing as interactional resources. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(12), 2133–2158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.010
Butler, C. W. (2008). Talk and social interaction in the playground. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Butler, C. W., Duncombe, R., Mason, C. & Sandford, R. (2016). Recruitments, engagements, and partitions: managing participation in play. International Journal of Play, 5(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2016.1147287
Butler, C. & Weatherall, A. (2006). ‘No, we’re not playing families’: Membership categorization in children’s play. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(4), 441–470. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_4
Caillois, R. & Halperin, E. P. (1955). The structure and classification of games. Diogenes, 3(12), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/039219215500301204
Chapman, M. (1991). The epistemic triangle: Operative and communicative components of cognitive development. In M. Chandler & M. Chapman (eds), Criteria for competence: Controversies in the conceptualization and assessment of children’s abilities (pp. 209–228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cobb-Moore, C., Danby, S., & Farrell, A. (2009). Young children as rule makers. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(8), 1477–1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.013
Corsaro, W. A. (1979). Children’s use of access rituals in a nursery school. Language in Society, 8, 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500007570
Corsaro, W. A. (2011). The sociology of childhood (?rd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Cromdal, J. (2001). ‘Can I be with?’ Negotiating play entry in a bilingual school. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 515–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00131-9
Danish, J. A., Enyedy, N., Saleh, A., Lee, C. & Andrade, A. (2015). Science through technology enhanced play: Designing to support reflection through play and embodiment. In O. Lindwall, Häkkinen, P., Koschman, T. Tchounikine, P. & Ludvigsen, S. (ed.), Exploring the material conditions of learning: The Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, volume 1 (pp. 332–339). Gothenburg: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
De León, L. (2007). Parallelism, metalinguistic play, and the interactive emergence of Zinacantec Mayan siblings’ culture. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40(4), 405–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701471401
DeLiema, D., Saleh, A., Lee, C., Enyedy, N., … Mahoney, C. (2016). Blending play and inquiry in augmented reality: A comparison of playing a video game to playing within a participatory model. In C.-K. Looi, J. Polman, U. Cress & P. Reimann (eds), Transforming learning, empowering learners: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences 2016, volume 2 (pp. 450–457). Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Deppermann, A. (2014). Multimodal participation in simultaneous joint projects. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada & M. Nevile (eds), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 247–281). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.187.09dep
Deppermann, A. & Günther, S. (2015). Introduction: Temporality in interaction. In A. Deppermann & S. Günther (eds), Temporality in interaction (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.27.001int
Duranti, A. & Burrel, K. (2004). Jazz improvisation: A search for hidden harmonies and a unique self. Ricerche di Psicologia, 27(3), 71.
Enyedy, N., Danish, J., Deliema, D., Saleh, A., Lee, C., Morris, N., Illum, R. (2017). Social affordances of mixed reality learning environments: A case from the Science through Technology Enhanced Play project (STEP). Proc. 50th Hawaii International Conf. System Sciences (pp. 2096–2105). [no location]: AIS Electronic Library. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2017.254
Fatigante, M., Liberati, V. & Pontecorvo, C. (2010). Transitions in and out of games: How parents and children bracket game episodes at home. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(4), 346–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2010.497631
Forrester, M. (2010). Ethnomethodology and adult-child conversation: Whose development. In H. F. Gardner & M. A. Forrester (eds), Analysing interactions in childhood: Insights from conversation analysis (pp. 42–58). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Frasca, G. (2003). Simulation versus narrative: Introduction to ludology. In M. J. P. Wolf & B. Perron (eds), The video game theory reader (pp. 221–235). New York: Routledge.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Garvey, C. (1974). Some properties of social play. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 20(3), 163–180.
Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: Free Press.
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-Operative Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, C. & Goodwin, M. H. (2004). Participation. In A. Duranti (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 222–244). Oxford: Blackwell.
Goodwin, M. H. (1980). He-said-she-said: Formal cultural procedures for the construction of a gossip dispute activity. American Ethnologist, 7(4), 674–695. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1980.7.4.02a00050
Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Goodwin, M. H. (2002). Exclusion in girls’ peer groups: Ethnographic analysis of language practices on the playground. Human development, 45(6), 392–415. https://doi.org/10.1159/000066260
Haddington, P., Keisanen, T., Mondada & L. Nevile, M. (eds). (2014). Beyond multitasking: Multiactivity in social interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hoey, E. M. (2015). Lapses: How people arrive at, and deal with, discontinuities in talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(4), 430–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1090116
Hoey, E., (2018). How speakers restart talk after a lapse in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(3). https://doi.10.1080/08351813.2018.
1485234
Hoey, E. M. & Kendrick, K. H. (2018). Conversation analysis. In A. M. B. De Groot & P. Hagoort (eds), Research methods in psycholinguistics and the neurobiology of language: A practical guide (pp. 151–173). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
Keenan, E. O. (1975). Conversational competence in children. Journal of Child Language, 1, 163–183.
Lerner, G. H. (1998). Completable projects and winnable games: Notes on the organization of activity. Paper presented at Center for Language, Interaction and Culture, UCLA.
Lerner, G. H. & Raymond, G. (2017). On the practical re-intentionalization of body behavior: Action pivots in the progressive realization of embodied conduct. In G. Raymond, G. H. Lerner & J. Herigage (eds), Enabling human conduct: Studies of talk-in-interaction in honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff (pp. 299–313). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.273.15ler
Lerner, G. H., Zimmerman, D. H. & Kidwell, M. (2011). Formal structures of practical tasks: A resource for action in the social life of very young children. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin & C. LeBaron (eds), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 44–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S. & Johnson, E. (2016). Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers & Education, 95, 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.001
Lindstrand, S. H. (2015). Are we spinning or is it the board? Young children’s interaction with an interactive whiteboard in preschool. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10(3), 124–144.
Mauss, M. (1936). The techniques of the body. Journal of Psychology, 32 (3–4), 271–293.
Mondada, L. (2009). Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(10), 1977–1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.019
Mondada, L. (2014). The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004
Mondada, L. (2016). Conventions for multimodal transcription. Retrieved on 14 March 2018 from https://franzoesistik.philhist.unibas.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/franzoesistik/mondada_multimodal_conventions.pdf.
Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
Mortensen, K. & Hazel, S. (2014). Moving into interaction: Social practices for initiating encounters at a help desk. Journal of Pragmatics, 62, 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.009
Nadel, J. & Fontaine, A. M. (1989). Communicating by imitation: A developmental and comparative approach to transitory social competence. In B. H. Schneider, G. Attili, J. Nadel & R. P. Weissberg (eds), Social competence in developmental perspective (pp. 131–144). Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2442-0_9
Pellegrini, A. D. (1995). School recess and playground behaviour. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Pellegrini, A. D. (2009). The role of play in human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367324.001.0001
Piaget, J. ([1945]1962). Play, dreams and imitation in children. New York: Norton.
Rendle-Short, J., Cobb-Moore, C. & Danby, S. (2014). Aligning in and through interaction: Children getting in and out of spontaneous activity. Discourse Studies, 16(6), 792–815. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445614546248
Robinson, J. D. (2013). Overall structural organization. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (eds), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 257–280). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Rogoff, B., Mistry, J., Göncü, A., Mosier, C., Chavajay, P. & Heath, S. B. (1993). Guided participation in cultural activity by toddlers and caregivers. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(8), 1–179. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166109
Ryave, A. L. & Schenkein, J. (1974). Notes on the art of walking. In R. Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology (pp. 265–274). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010
Schegloff, E. A. (2006). On possibles. Discourse studies, 8(1), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059563
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208
Schegloff, E. A. & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (eds). (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Stivers, T. & Sidnell, J. (2016). Proposals for Activity Collaboration. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(2), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1164409
Stivers, T., Sidnell, J. & Bergen, C. (2018). Children’s responses to questions in peer interaction: A window into the ontogenesis of interactional competence. Journal of Pragmatics 124, 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.11.013
Theobald, M., Danby, S., Einarsdóttir, J., Bourne, J., Jones, D., Ross, S., Knaggs, H. & Carter-Jones, C. (2015). Children’s perspectives of play and learning for educational practice. Education Sciences, 5(4), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci5040345
Van Liempd, H. I. M., Oudgenoeg-Paz, O., Fukkink, R. G. & Leseman, P. P. (2018). Young children’s exploration of the indoor playroom space in center-based childcare. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 43, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.11.005
Vygotsky, L. (1978). The role of play in development (trans. M. Cole). In L. Vygotsky, Mind in Society (pp. 92–104) . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.