On “Parents” and “Children” in Vedic Tradition

Authors

  • Adéla Sandness St. Francis Xavier University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.v33i1.93

Keywords:

Ṛg-Veda, Veda, creation, Vā́c, Prajā́pati, Agní

Abstract

In the symbolic language of Vedic tradition, parental relationships are among the ways used by poets to articulate relationships between the one and the many, the parts and the whole. Mythological figures, and the principles they represent, are named as offspring to indicate that they are made manifest by an originator or “parent.” In some cases, what is named is the inter-relationship of principles through a cyclical process of “reverse” parenting. Prajapati, or Sacrifice, for example, is the father of his son, the fire god Agní and yet Agní, in turn, gives birth to him. There is also a well-known pattern of creation by an original “parent” or “one,” who gives birth to a “second,” and from these two “parents” arises the manifest world of the many. This paper will examine ideas of creation and re-creation through a study of parental relationships in Vedic tradition.

References

Aufrecht, Theodor. 1968. Die Hymnen des Rigveda. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.

Bergaigne, Abel. 1878 & 1883. La Réligion védique d’après les hymnes du Rig-Veda. Paris: Vieweg, tome I, 1878; tome II, 1883; tome III, 1883.

Biardeau, Madeleine. 1981. Études de mythologie hindoue I. Cosmogonies Puranques. Vol. 128. Pondichéry: École Française d’Extrême-Orient.

Doniger, O’Flaherty, Wendy. 1975 Hindu Myths: A Sourcebook Translated from the Sanskrit. New York: Penguin Books, 1987 Repr.

Elizarenkova, Tatyana. 1996–1997. “The Concept of Water and the Names for it in the Rgveda.” Orientalia Suecana XLV-XLVI (1996–1997): 21–29.

Gonda, Jan. 1991. The Functions and Significance of Gold in the Veda. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

Kuiper, Franciscus Bernardus Jacobos. 1960. “The Ancient Aryan Verbal Contest.” Indo-Iranian Journal 4: 217–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/000000060790085609

Malamoud, C. 1989. Cuire le monde: rite et pensée dans l’inde ancienne. Paris: Éditions de la découverte.

———. 2005. Féminité de la parole: Études sur l’inde ancienne. Paris: Éditions Albin Michel.

[Matsya-Purana] 1907. Matsya-Purana. Poona: Anandasrama Sanskrit Series 54.

Renou, Louis. 1939. “L’ambiguité du vocabulaire du Rgveda.” Jouranal Asiatique 231(4–6): 161–235.

———. 1956. Études védiques et paninéennes (ÉVP) II. Paris: E de Bocard.

———. 1978. “Les origins de la notion de maya dans la speculation indienne.” In L’Inde fondementale, Études d’indianisme réunies et présentées par Ch. Malamoud. Paris: Hermann (collection “Savoir”): 133–140.

Sandness, Adela. 2007. “On rta and Brahman: Visions of Existence in the Rg-Veda.” Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute 88: 61–80.

[Visnu-Purana] 1972. Visnu-Purana with the commentary of Shrihara. Calcutta: Santana Sastra.

Weber, Albrecht. ed. 1855. Satapatha-Brahmana in the Madhyandina-Sakha with Extracts from the Commentaries of Sayanna, Harisvamin and Dvivedaganga. London: Williams and Norgate.

Published

2014-06-17

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sandness, A. (2014). On “Parents” and “Children” in Vedic Tradition. Religious Studies and Theology, 33(1), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.v33i1.93