Balancing Dichotomies, Opening Conversations

A Reflection on Michel Desjardins’ Contribution to the Study of Religion in the Classroom and Beyond

Authors

  • Philip L Tite University of Washington Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.38708

Keywords:

balance, collaborative pedagogy, early Christianity, food, research, empowerment

Abstract

Having known Michel since the first stages of his career, when he was engaged in the study of early Christianity, I have seen him exemplify the role of teacher-scholar for those of us who have attempted to follow in his footsteps. His approach has been to empower students by creating conversations, to balance opposing positions and to allow students to come to their own conclusions (rather than arriving at the “right answer”). This approach not only occurs in the classroom, but also within the academy. Indeed, I propose that Michel’s role as a researcher is largely an extension of his role as a teacher, or co-learner. In this paper, I explore some of the pedagogical implications and lessons that I have learned from Michel’s example as a teacher-scholar. Specifically, I discuss attachment theory, student empowerment, and collaborative pedagogy.

References

Ainsworth, Mary. 1969. “Object Relations, Dependency, and Attachment: A Theoretical Review of the Infant-Mother Relationship.” Child Development 40(4): 969–1025. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127008

———. 1985. “Attachments Across the Life Span.” Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 61(9): 792–812.

Bowlby, John. 1969. Attachment and Loss. Volume 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.

———. 1973. Attachment and Loss. Volume 2: Separation, Anxiety, and Anger. New York: Basic Books.

———. 1980. Attachment and Loss. Volume 3: Loss. New York: Basic Books.

Bretherton, Inge. 1992. “The Origins of Attachment Theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth.” Developmental Psychology 28(5): 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.28.5.759

Desjardins, Michel. 1985. “Law in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch.” Studies in Religion/Sciences religieuses 14(1): 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/000842988501400104

———. 1986. “The Sources for Valentinian Gnosticism: A Question of Methodology.” Vigiliae Christianae 40(4): 342–347. https://doi.org/10.2307/1584034

———. 1987. “The Portrayal of the Dissidents in 2 Peter and Jude.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 9(30): 89–102.

———. 1990. Sin in Valentinianism. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series, 108. Atlanta, GA: Scholars.

———. 1991a. “Bauer and Beyond: The Scholarly Discussion of hairesis in the Early Christian Era.” Second Century 8(2): 65–82.

———. 1991b. “The New Testament Canon and the Modern Mind.” Paper presented at the 1991 Christianity and Culture Symposium, St. Michael’s College, Toronto, Ontario, October 8.

———. 1992. “Where was the Gospel of Thomas Written?” Toronto Journal of Theology 8(1): 121–133.

Desjardins, Michel. 1994a. “Yamauchi and Pre-Christian Gnosticism.” In Hellenization Revisited: Shaping a Christian Response within the Greco-Roman World, edited by Wendy E. Helleman, 63–67. New York: University Press of America. https://doi.org/10.2307/1088892

———. 1994b. “Judaism and Gnosticism.” In Hellenization Revisited: Shaping a Christian Response within the Greco-Roman World, edited by Wendy E. Helleman, 309–321. New York: University Press of America. https://doi.org/10.2307/1088892

———. 1996. “Introduction to The Apocalypse of Peter.” In Nag Hammadi Codex VII, edited by Birger Pearson, 201–216. Nag Hammadi Studies, 30. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110884449.15

———. 1997. Peace, Violence and the New Testament. Biblical Seminar Series. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic.

———. 1998. “Like a Cook in a Café.” Studies in Religion/Sciences religieuses 27(1): 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/000842989802700107

———. 1999. “Touching the Tassels: The Changing Role of Course Syllabi in the Academy.” Religious Studies News 14(2): “Spotlight on Teaching” 7(1): 7–8.

———. 2001. “Teaching with the Guide to the Study of Religion.” ARC: The Journal of the Faculty of Religious Studies, McGill University 29: 139–150.

———. 2003. “AAR’s Syllabus Project: Past, Present and Future.” Religious Studies News 18(3): 5, 11.

———. 2004. “Teaching about Religion with Food.” Teaching Theology and Religion 7(3): 153–158.

———. 2005. “Baptism among the Valentinians.” Origini: Journal of Cultural Studies 8(1–2): 122–143.

———. 2007. “Netting a Job in Religious Studies.” In The Next Step in Studying Religion: A Graduate’s Guide, edited by Mathieu E. Courville, 29–39. London: Continuum.

———. 2011. “Training the Next Generation of Teachers of Religious Studies: A Canadian Case Study.” Religion 41(2): 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721x.2011.579789

———. 2013. “Practicalities and Pedagogies: Implementing International Learning Opportunities for Students.” In The World is my Classroom: Priorities for Globalizing Canadian Higher Education, edited by Joanne Benham Rennick and Michel Desjardins, 215–235. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442669079-013

Desjardins, Michel and Ellen Desjardins. 2009. “Food that Builds Community: The Sikh Langar in Canada.” Cuizine: The Journal of Canadian Food Cultures / Revue des cultures culinaires au Canada 1(2). https://doi.org/10.7202/037851ar

Desjardins, Michel and Yasaman Samiksa Munro. 2014. “Roundtable on Pedagogy: Response: A Conversation on Renunciation in Pedagogy.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 82(2): 338–347. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfu004

Desjardins, Michel and Joanne Benham Rennick. 2013. “Towards a Pedagogy of Good Global Citizenship.” In The World is my Classroom: Priorities for Globalizing Canadian Higher Education, edited by Joanne Benham Rennick and Michel Desjardins, 3–15. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442669079-003

Dunderberg, Ismo. 2008. Beyond Gnosticism: Myth, Lifestyle, and Society in the School of Valentinus. New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/dund14172

Fischler, Claude. 2011. “Commensality, Society and Culture.” Social Science Information 50(3–4): 528–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018411413963

Gold, Jerry. 2011. “Attachment Theory and Psychotherapy Integration: An Introduction and Review of the Literature.” Journal of Psychotherapy Integration 21(3): 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025490

King, Karen L. 2003. What Is Gnosticism? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Kirkpatrick, Lee A. 1995. “Attachment Theory and Religious Experience.” In Handbook of Religious Experience, edited by Ralph W. Hood, Jr., 446–475. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education.

———. 2005. Attachment, Evolution, and the Psychology of Religion. New York: Guilford.

Markin, Rayna D. and Cheri Marmarosh. 2010. “Application of Adult Attachment Theory to Group Member Transference and the Group Therapy Process.” Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training 47(1): 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018840

Okozi, Innocent F. 2010. “Attachment to God: Its Impact on the Psychological Wellbeing of Persons with Religious Vocation.” PhD dissertation, Seton Hall University.

Reinert, Duane F. and Carla E. Edwards. 2009. “Attachment Theory, Childhood Mistreatment, and Religiosity.” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 1(1): 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014894

Richards, David A. and Aaron C. H. Schat. 2010. “Attachment at (Not to) Work: Applying Attachment Theory to Explain Individual Behavior in Organizations.” Journal of Applied Psychology 96(1): 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020372

Tite, Philip L. 1997. Compositional Transitions in 1 Peter: An Analysis of the Letter-Opening. San Francisco: International Scholars.

Tite, Philip L. 2001. “Categorical Designations and Methodological Reductionism: Gnosticism as Case Study.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 13 (3): 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006801x00246

———. 2003. “On the Necessity of Crisis: A Reflection on Pedagogical Conflict and the Academic Study of Religion.” Teaching Theology and Religion 6(2): 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9647.00157

———. 2004a. “Teaching with Faith Crisis: A Summary of ‘On the Necessity of Crisis’.” Didache: Faithful Teaching 3(2). http://nazarene.org/iboe/riie/didache_vol3_2

———. 2004b. “An Exploration of Valentinian Paraenesis: Rethinking Gnostic Ethics in the Interpretation of Knowledge (NHC XI, 1).” Harvard Theological Review 97(3): 275–304. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0017816004000719

———. 2004c. Conceiving Peace and Violence: A New Testament Legacy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

———. 2009. Valentinian Ethics and Paraenetic Discourse: Determining the Social Function of Moral Exhortation in Valentinian Christianity. Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies, 67. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/157007210x520361

———. 2013. “Theoretical Challenges in Studying Religious Experience in Gnosticism: A Prolegomena for Social Analysis.” Bulletin for the Study of Religion 42(1): 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1558/bsor.v42i1.8

———. 2015. “Social and Ethical Concern in the Interpretation of Knowledge (NHC XI 1): A Rhetorical Analysis of Interp. Know. 20.36–38.” Journal of Biblical Literature 134(3): 651–673. https://doi.org/10.1353/jbl.2015.0028

Weiss, Robert S. 1973. Loneliness: The Experience of Emotional and Social Isolation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

———. 1982. “Attachment in Adult Life.” In The Place of Attachment in Human Behavior, edited by C. M. Parkes and J. S. Hinde, 171–184. New York: Basic Books.

Williams, Michael Allen. 1996. Rethinking “Gnosticism”: An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/3170779

Published

2019-05-14

How to Cite

Tite, P. L. (2019). Balancing Dichotomies, Opening Conversations: A Reflection on Michel Desjardins’ Contribution to the Study of Religion in the Classroom and Beyond. Religious Studies and Theology, 38(1-2), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.38708