Situating Writing Pedagogy within the Educational Curriculum

Authors

  • Martha C Pennington City University of Hong Kong Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v6i1.1

Keywords:

pedagogy, education, curriculum

Author Biography

  • Martha C Pennington, City University of Hong Kong

    Martha Pennington is Visiting Professor of English at City University of Hong Kong and editor of the journal Writing & Pedagogy. She is the author of The Computer and the Non-Native Writer (Hampton Press), Writing in an Electronic Medium: Research with Language Learners (Athelstan), and articles on the teaching of writing and the education of writing teachers that have appeared in Computers and Composition, Computer Assisted Language Learning, Journal of Second Language Writing, System, TESOL Quarterly, and many edited collections. She is also most recently a co-editor (with Pauline Burton) of The College Writing Toolkit: Tried and Tested Ideas for College Writing (Equinox) and co-author (with Barbara J. Hoekje) of Language Program Leadership for a Changing World: An Ecological Model (Emerald). Pennington has won awards for educational leadership from the UK as a National Teaching Fellow and from the TOEFL group of the Educational Testing Service (Princeton, New Jersey).

References

Barnes, D. and Shemilt, D. (1974) Transmission and interpretation. Educational Review 26(3): 213–228.

Brown, J. D. (1995) The Elements of the Language Curriculum. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.

Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1991) The Social Construction of Reality. London: Penguin Books.

Bruce, B. C. and Hogan, M. P. (1998) The disappearance of technology: Toward an ecological model of literacy. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Laboo and R. Kiefer (eds.), Handbook of Literacy and Technology: Transformations in a Post-Typographic World 269–281. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Calkins, L. M. (1994) The Art of Teaching Writing (2nd edition). Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann.

Coyle, D., Hood, P. and Marsh, D. (2010) Content and language Integrated Learning. Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press.

Cummins, J. (2001) Negotiating Identities: Education for Empowerment in a Diverse Society (2nd edition). Los Angeles: California Association for Bilingual Education.

Cummins J. (2011) Identity matters: From evidence-free to evidence-based policies for promoting achievement among students from marginalized social groups. Writing & Pedagogy 3(2): 189–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/wap.v3i2.189.

Cummins, J. and Early, M. (2011) Identity Texts: The Collaborative Creation of Power in multilingual schools. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.

Freire, P. (1985) The Politics of Education: Culture, Power, and Liberation. South Hadley, Massachusetts: Bergin & Garvey.

Fulwiler, T. and Young, A. (1982/2000) Language Connections: Writing and Reading across the Curriculum. Urbana, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English. Reprinted by ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 218 667, and digitally by Fort Collins, Colorado: WAC Clearinghouse, 2000. Retrieved on 17 March 2013 from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/language_connections/.

Gay, G. (2000) Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

King, B. W. (forthcoming) Online writing as a discovery process: Synchronous collaboration. In A. Chik, T. Costley, and M. C. Pennington (eds.) Creativity and Discovery in the University Writing Course: A Teacher’s Guide. Sheffield, U.K. and Oakville, Connecticut: Equinox.

Kruch, M. A. (2012) Tend Your Garden: Nurturing Motivation in Young Adolescent Writers. Sheffield, U. K. and Oakville, Connecticut: Equinox.

North American Montessori Center (2014) What Is Montessori: Overview. Retrieved on 17 March 2014 from http://www.montessoritraining.net/what_is_montessori/overview.htm.

Piaget, J. (1962) Play, Dreams, and Imitation in Childhood. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.

Remley, D. (2013) Templated pedagogy: Factors affecting standardized writing pedagogy with online learning management systems. Writing & Pedagogy 5(1): 105–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/wap.v4i5.1.

Richards, J. C. and Rodgers, T. S. (2014) Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis (3rd edition). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Shermis, M. D. and Burstein, J. (eds.) (2013) Handbook of Automated Essay Evaluation: Current Applications and New Directions. New York: Routledge.

Snow, M. and Brinton, D. (eds.) (1997) The Content-based Classroom: Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content. White Plains, New York: Longman.

Stanley, G. (2003, July 28) Approaches to process writing. British Council Website. Retrieved on 17 March 2014 from https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/approaches-process-writing.

Sullivan, S. and Glanz, J. (2006) Building Effective Learning Communities. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.

Taylor, S. V. and Sobel, D. M. (2011) Culturally Responsive Pedagogy: Teaching like our Students’ Lives Matter. Leiden: Brill.

The Reading and Writing Project (2010) Writing Assessments. Retrieved on 17 March 2014 from http://readingandwritingproject.com/resources/assessments/writing-assessments.html.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of higher Psychological Processes (eds. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner and E. Souberman). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

WAC Clearinghouse (2014) Introduction to WAC. Retrieved on 17 March 2014 from http://wac.colostate.edu/intro/pop4d.cfm.

Warschauer, M. (2009) Learning to write in the laptop classroom. Writing & Pedagogy 1(1): 101–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/wap.v1i1.101.

White, R. and Arndt, V. (1991) Process Writing. Essex, U. K. Addison-Wesley Longman.

Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J. (2006) Understanding by Design: A Framework for Effecting Curricular Development and Assessment. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Downloads

Published

2014-06-10

Issue

Section

Editorial

How to Cite

Pennington, M. C. (2014). Situating Writing Pedagogy within the Educational Curriculum. Writing and Pedagogy, 6(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v6i1.1