Preventing Plagiarism
Working with What Works
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v2i2.281Keywords:
plagiarism, first-year writing, university policyAbstract
In the academy, approaches to handling plagiarism vary widely. Some – for example, the approaches of programs that use turnitin.com or similar software – favor detection and punishment. Others view instances of plagiarism as teaching moments, while still others argue that a culture-wide change in values is required for plagiarism to diminish. Our discussion examines these different perspectives, tracing them to their disciplinary or structural homes, before suggesting a practical pedagogy of plagiarism instruction that reconciles the differing approaches.
References
Barry, E. S. (2006) Can paraphrasing practice help students define plagiarism? College Student Journal 40: 377–384. Retrieved 11 November 2009 from Academic Search Complete (AN 21375562).
Bertram Gallant, T. and Drinan, P. (2006) Organizational theory and student cheating: Explanation, responses, and strategies. Journal of Higher Education 77: 839–860. Retrieved 11 November 2009 from Academic Search Complete (AN 438902).
Carroll, J. (2002) Suggestions for teaching international students more effectively. Learning and Teaching Briefing Papers Series, Oxford Brookes University. Retrieved 11 November 2009 from http://www.brookes.ac.uk/services/ocsd
Drum, A. (1986) Responding to plagiarism. College Composition and Communication 37: 241–243. Retrieved 11 November 2009 from JSTOR http://www.jstor.org/stable/357525
Duff, A. H., Rogers, D., and Harris, M. B. (2006) International engineering students – Avoiding plagiarism through understanding the Western academic context of scholarship. European Journal of Engineering Education 31: 673–681. Retrieved 11 November 2009 from Academic Search Complete (AN 438902).
Emory University. (n.d.) Honor code. Retrieved 12 November 2009 from http://www.college.emory.edu/current/standards/honor_code.html
Harms, D. (October 2006) Plagiarism, publishing, and the academy. Journal of Scholarly Publishing 38: 1–13. Retrieved 11 November 2009 from Academic Search Complete database (AN 23181020).
Howard, R. M. (1995) Plagiarisms, authorships, and the academic death penalty. College English 57: 788–806. Retrieved 11 November 2009 from JSTOR http://www.jstor.org/stable/378403
Howard, R. M. (2000) Sexuality, textuality: The cultural work of plagiarism. College English: 473–491. Retrieved 11 November 2009 from JSTOR http://www.jstor.org/stable/378866
Howard, R. M. (2002) Don’t police plagiarism: Just teach. Education Digest 67: 546–549. Retrieved 11 November 2009 from Academic Search Complete (AN 0013127X).
3Macdonald, R. and Carroll, J. (2006) Plagiarism – a complex issue requiring a holistic institutional approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31: 233–245. doi:10.1080/02602930500262536.
Price, M. (2002) Beyond “Gotcha!”: Situating plagiarism in policy and pedagogy. College Composition and Communication 54: 88–115. Retrieved 11 November 2009 from JSTOR http://www.jstor.org/stable/1512103
Ruskiewicz, J. E., Walker, J. R., and Pemberton, M. (2006) Bookmarks: A Guide to Research and Writing. New York: Longman.
Wells, D. (1993) An account of the complex causes of unintentional plagiarism in college writing. Writing Program Administration 16: 59–71.
Williams, B. T. (2003) Speak for yourself? Power and hybridity in the cross-cultural classroom. College Composition and Communication 54: 586–609. Retrieved 11 November 2009 from JSTOR http://www.jstor.org/stable/3594186