Indexing metadata

15. The Good, The Bad, and the Non-Religion: The Good/Bad Rhetoric in Non-Religion Studies


 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document 15. The Good, The Bad, and the Non-Religion: The Good/Bad Rhetoric in Non-Religion Studies - Hijacked
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Christopher Cotter; Lancaster University; United Kingdom
 
3. Subject Discipline(s) Religious Studies
 
4. Subject Keyword(s) fundamentalism; sociology and religion; politics and religion; objectivity; insider/outsider problem; rhetoric; religion in the media; interpretation of Islam; public discourse on religion; value judgements
 
5. Subject Subject classification sociology of religion; politics of religion
 
6. Description Abstract This essay explores the ‘rhetoric of good and bad religion’ in regard to recent scholarship on ‘non-religion.’ Engaging with Aaron Hughes description of the ways in which this rhetoric is active in ‘Islamic Religious Studies,’ the author demonstrates that scholars writing on ‘non-religion’ equally make use of these tropes. He also argues that such rhetoric allows ‘religious’ and ‘non-religious’ moderates to build alliances against anything that is seen to challenge the legitimacy of the liberal, secular state. The conclusion points out that the Christian assumptions perpetuated by non-religion studies and its tacit promotion of neoliberal values have to be critically reflected upon.
 
7. Publisher Organizing agency, location Equinox Publishing Ltd
 
8. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
9. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 15-Aug-2020
 
10. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
11. Type Type
 
12. Format File format PDF
 
13. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/books/article/view/35430
 
14. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.1558/equinox.35430
 
15. Source Journal/conference title; vol., no. (year) Equinox eBooks Publishing; Hijacked
 
16. Language English=en en
 
18. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
19. Rights Copyright and permissions Copyright 2014 Equinox Publishing Ltd