Indexing metadata

9. Reply to Russell T. McCutcheon: Navigating the Politics of Comparison


 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document 9. Reply to Russell T. McCutcheon: Navigating the Politics of Comparison - Strategic Acts in the Study of Identity
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Leslie Dorrough Smith; Avila University;
 
3. Subject Discipline(s) Religious Studies; social sciences
 
4. Subject Keyword(s)
 
6. Description Abstract In the main chapter of this section, I argued that many Western
feminist scholars are often quite willing to overlook the conservative
political interests of many international women’s groups
by calling such groups “feminist” so as to create the sense of
a diverse and multicultural feminist movement. Mine is not a
popular conclusion to reach, I note, since making such a statement
reveals a clear double standard that is still present in some
feminist activism. In response, Russell McCutcheon pondered
whether my unpopular argument was like another controversial
piece of scholarship from scholar Rebecca Tuvel, who infamously
claimed that if a transgender identity is possible, then
we must logically acknowledge the possibility of a transracial
identity as well. In the present chapter, I consider the nature of
McCutcheon’s comparison between my conclusion and Tuvel’s,
and maintain that their similarities reveal the enduring life of
certain unspoken biases in scholarship today
 
7. Publisher Organizing agency, location Equinox Publishing Ltd
 
8. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
9. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 07-Jan-2019
 
10. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
11. Type Type
 
12. Format File format PDF
 
13. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://journals.equinoxpub.com/books/article/view/35646
 
14. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.1558/equinox.35646
 
15. Source Journal/conference title; vol., no. (year) Equinox eBooks Publishing; Strategic Acts in the Study of Identity
 
16. Language English=en en
 
18. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
19. Rights Copyright and permissions Copyright 2014 Equinox Publishing Ltd