International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, Vol 21, No 2 (2014)

‘Are you going to tell me the truth today?’: Invoking obligations of honesty in police-suspect interviews.

Kelly Benneworth-Gray
Issued Date: 18 Feb 2015


Current police interviewing guidelines describe the investigative interview as a ‘search for truth’ (National Crime Faculty 2004). A wealth of social science literature treats ‘truth’ in the criminal justice system, like ‘honesty’, ‘lies’ and ‘deception’, as a product of individual intent and decision-making – an absolute which can be systematically observed and measured. Discourse analytic and conversation analytic methods were used to examine how police interviewers talked about ‘truth’ and ‘honesty’ in three interviews with adult males suspected of sexual offences against children. What do references to ‘truth’ and ‘honesty’ look like? Where are they positioned? How are they managed sequentially? The analysis revealed that ‘truth’ and ‘honesty’ are locally invoked interactional resources, produced, recognised and contested in two very different sequential environments. Firstly, the interviewers set up a contractual obligation to ‘tell the truth’ at the outset of the interviews. These obligations comprise an expectation of truth, a direct request for truth and a reciprocal offer of truth. This contractual obligation is then revisited later in the interview as a resource to mark disjuncture between the testimonies of the suspect and the alleged victim and construct the suspect’s testimony as implausible. This article outlines some of the implications of these observations for the development of interviewing practice.

Download Media

PDF (Price: £17.50 )

DOI: 10.1558/ijsll.v21i2.251


Atkinson, JM and Drew, P (1979) Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: Macmillan.
Auburn, T, Drake, S and Willig, C (1995) “You punched him, didn’t you?”: Versions of violence in accusatory interviews. Discourse and Society, 6 (3): 353-386.
Auburn, T, Lea, S and Drake, S (1999) ‘It’s your opportunity to be truthful’: Disbelief, Mundane Reasoning and the Investigation of Crime. In C Willig (ed.) Applied Discourse Analysis: Social and Psychological Interventions. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. (pp. 44-65)
Baldwin, J (1993) Police interview techniques: Establishing truth or proof? British Journal of Criminology, 33: 325–351.
Barnes, JA (1994) A pack of lies: Towards a sociology of lying. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BBC (2009) Aneurin Bevan. Available at: [accessed 5th February 2014]
BBC News (2012) Who, what, why: Why do police still use cassette tapes? Available at: [accessed 5th February 2014]
Benneworth, K. (2006) Repertoires of paedophilia: conflicting descriptions of adult-child sexual relationships in the investigative interview. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law. 13 (2): 190-211.
Benneworth, K. (2007) ‘Just good friends’: managing the clash of discourses in police interviews with paedophiles. In J. Cotterill (ed.) The Language of Sexual Crime. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan (42-62).
Benneworth, K. (2009) Police interviews with suspected paedophiles: A discourse analysis. Discourse and Society. 20 (5): 555-569.
Benneworth, K. (2010) Negotiating paedophilia: How sexual offences are constructed in the investigative interview. In M. Coulthard and A. Johnson (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics. Oxon: Routledge (139-154).
Bilmes, J. (1988) The concept of preference in conversation analysis. Language in Society, 17(2): 161-181.
Bok, S (1978) Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. London: Quartet.
Clift, R (2001) Meaning in interaction: The case of actually. Language, 77(2): 245-291.
Cotterill, J (2000) Reading the rights: A cautionary tale of comprehension and comprehensibility. Forensic linguistics, 7(1): 4-25.
Craven, A and Potter, J (2010) Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies, 12: 419-442
Curl, T S and Drew, P (2008) Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41 (2): 1–25.
The Crown Prosecution Service (2011) Public Justice Offences incorporating the Charging Standard: Perverting the Course of Justice. [accessed 5th February 2014]
DePaulo, BM, Lindsay, JJ, Malone, BE, Muhlenbruck, L, Charlton, K, and Cooper, H (2003) Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129: 74–118.
DirectGov (2011) Your rights at a police station after being arrested: Police caution. Available at: [accessed 5th February 2014]
Drew, P (1992) Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In P Drew and J Heritage (eds.) Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drew, P (1998) Complaints About Transgressions and Misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31: 3-4, 295-325.
Drew, P and Heritage, J (1992) Analysing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds.) Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 3-65).
Edwards, D (2006) Facts, norms and dispositions: Practical uses of the modal would in police interrogations. Discourse Studies, 8: 475–501.
Edwards, D and Fasulo, A (2006). “To be honest”: Sequential uses of honesty phrases in talk-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39 (4): 343-376.
Edwards, D and Potter, J (1992) Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
Ekman, P, O’Sulivan, M, and Frank, GM (1999). A few can catch a liar. Psychological Science, 10: 263–266.
Grice, HP (1975) Logic and conversation. In P Cole & NL Morgan (eds.) Syntax and semantics. Volume 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press. (pp. 41-58).
Haworth, K (2006) The dynamics of power and resistance in police interview discourse. Discourse and Society, 17 (6): 739–759.
Heritage, J and Roth, A (1995) Grammar and institution: Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28 (1): 1–60.
Heydon, G (2005) The language of police interviewing: A critical analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Heydon, G. (2011) Silence: Civil right or social privilege? A discourse analytic response to a legal problem. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(9): 2308–2316.
Home Office (1992) Principles of Investigative Interviewing. Circular 22. London: The Home Office.
Jefferson, G (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G Lerner (ed.) Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (pp.13-31)
Kassin, S.M. and McNall, K. (1991) Police interrogation and confessions: Communicating promises and threats by pragmatic implication. Law and Human Behaviour, 15(3): 233-251.
Kidwell, M (2009) What Happened?: An Epistemics of Before and After in “At-the-Scene” Police Questioning. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42 (1): 20-41.
Komter, M (2003) The interactional dynamics of eliciting a confession in a Dutch police interrogation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36 (4): 433-470.
Labov, W and Fanshel, D (1977) Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press.
McConville, M, Sanders, A, and Leng, R (1991) The Case for the Prosecution: Police Suspects and the Construction of Criminality. London: Routledge.
Moston, S, Stephenson, G, and Williamson, T (1992) The effects of case characteristics on suspect behaviour during police questioning. British Journal of Criminology, 32: 23–40.
National Crime Faculty (2004) Practical Guide to Investigative Interviewing. Bramshill: Central Police Training and Development Authority.
Oxford Dictionaries (2011) Available at: [accessed 5th February 2014]
Pearse, J and Gudjonsson, G (1996) Police interviewing techniques at two South London police stations. Psychology, Crime and Law, 3: 63–74.
Porter, S and Yuille, JC (1996) The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal cues to deception in the interrogation content. Law and Human Behavior, 20 (4): 443–458.
Raymond, G (2003) Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding. American Sociological Review 68: 939–67.
Rock, F (2007) Communicating rights: The Language of Arrest and Detention. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schegloff, E.A. (1987) Analysing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2): 101-114.
Shepherd, E (1991) Ethical interviewing. Policing, 7 (1): 42-60.
Stivers, T and Rossano, F (2010) Mobilizing Response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(1): 3-31
Vrij, A., Mann, S., Kristen, S. and Fisher, R.P. (2007) Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles. Law and Human Behaviour, 31(5): 499-518.
Vrij, A (2008) Detecting lies and deceit: pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester: Wiley.
Watson, DR (1978) Categorisation, authorisation and blame-negotiation in conversation. Sociology, 12: 105-113.
Watson, DR (1990) Some Features of the Elicitation of Confessions in Murder Interrogations. In G Psathas (ed.) Interaction Competence. Lanham, MD: University Press of America. (pp. 263–95)
Wesson, M (2000) A Novelist's Perspective. DePaul Law Review: 50th Anniversary Symposium on Civil Litigation and Popular Culture.
Williamson, T (1994) From interrogation to investigative interviewing: strategic trends in police questioning. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 3: 89-99.
The Sexual Offences Act (2003) The National Archives. Available at: [accessed 5th February 2014]


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email: [email protected]

Privacy Policy