Speech naturalness ratings and perceptual correlates of highly natural and unnatural speech in hypokinetic dysarthria secondary to Parkinson’s disease

doi:10.1558/jircd.v7i1.27932

Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, Vol 7, No 1 (2016)

Speech naturalness ratings and perceptual correlates of highly natural and unnatural speech in hypokinetic dysarthria secondary to Parkinson’s disease

Marie Klopfenstein

Issued Date: 21 Jun 2016

Abstract

Despite the importance of speech naturalness to treatment outcomes, little research has been done on what constitutes speech naturalness and how to best maximize naturalness in relationship to other treatment goals like intelligibility. This study investigated the speech naturalness ratings of individuals with dysarthria and the associated perceptual correlates of highly natural and unnatural speech. Four speakers with hypokinetic dysarthria secondary to Parkinson’s disease were recorded and rated for naturalness by 69 students in Communication Disorders. Students were presented with 436 speech samples and asked to provide speech naturalness ratings on a 1-9 Likert scale. After rating speech samples, subjects listed perceptual cues associated with samples rated most and least natural and weighted each cue on a visual analog scale. The data on naturalness ratings showed that spontaneous speech was rated the least natural on average, while sentences from a short story were rated slightly more natural and individually read sentences were rated the most natural of all of the utterance types. Thirteen themes emerged from the perceptual cues collected. Of the thirteen themes, intelligibility was rated significantly more important than other cues in highly natural speech and intelligibility and articulation were rated significantly more important than other cues in highly unnatural speech.

Download Media

PDF (Price: £17.50 ) Restricted Access

DOI: 10.1558/jircd.v7i1.27932

References

Ambady, N., Laplante, D., Nguyen, T., Rosenthal, R., Chaumeton, N., and Levinson, W. (2002). Surgeons’ tone of voice: a clue to malpractice history. Surgery, 132 (1): 5–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/msy.2002.124733

Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3: 77–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Coughlin, S. S. (1998). Speech naturalness of normal speaking children and adolescents. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

Dagenais, P. A., and Wilson, A. F. (2002). Acceptability and intelligibility of moderately dysarthric speech by four types of listener. In F. Windsor, M. L. Kelly, and N. Hewlett (Eds), Investigations in Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics, 363–372. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds) (2000). Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dodson, C. S., Johnson, M. K., and Schooler, J. W. (1997). The verbal overshadowing effect: Why descriptions impair face recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25 (2): 129–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03201107

George, D., and Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 11.0 Update (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Hayes, A. F., and Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1 (1): 77–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336664

Ingham, R. J., and Onslow, M. (1985). Measurement and modification of speech naturalness during stuttering therapy. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 50 (3): 261–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/jshd.5003.261

Ingham, R. J., Gow, M., and Costello, J. M. (1985). Stuttering and speech naturalness: Some additional data. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 50 (2): 217–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/jshd.5002.217

Jaccard, J., and Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL Approaches to Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Keppel, G. (1992). Design and Analysis – A Researcher’s Handbook (3rd ed.). Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Martin, R. R., Haroldson, S. K., and Triden, K. A. (1984). Stuttering and speech naturalness. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49 (1): 53–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/jshd.4901.53

Miller, N., Noble, E., Jones, D., and Burn, D. (2006). Life with communication changes in Parkinson’s disease. Age and Ageing, 35 (3): 235–239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afj053

Miller, N., Noble, E., Jones, D., Allcock, L., and Burn, D. J. (2008). How do I sound to me? Perceived changes in communication in Parkinson’s disease. Clinical Rehabilitation, 22 (1): 14–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215507079096

Morse, J. M., and Richards, L. (2002). Readme First for a User’s Guide to Qualitative Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Onslow, M., and Ingham, R. J. (1987). Speech quality measurement and the management of stuttering. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52 (1): 2–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/jshd.5201.02

Polit, D.F., and Beck, C. T. (2006). Essentials of Nursing Research: Methods, Appraisal and Utilization (6th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.

Runyan, C. M., Hames, P. E., and Prosek, R. A. (1982). A perceptual comparison between paired stimulus and single stimulus methods of presentation of the fluent utterances of stutterers. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 7 (1): 71–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0094-730X(82)90040-7

Sacco, P. R., Metz, D. E., and Schiavetti, N. (1992). Speech naturalness of nonstutterers and treated stutterers: Acoustical correlates. Presentation to the Annual Meeting of the American Speech–Language–Hearing Association, San Antonio, TX.

Schooler, J. W., and Engstler-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22 (1): 36–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(90)90003-M

Wenke, R. J., Theodoros, D., and Cornwell, P. (2010). Effectiveness of Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT) on hypernasality in non-progressive dysarthria: The need for further research. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 45 (1): 31–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13682820802638618

Whitehill, T. L. (2002). Assessing intelligibility in speakers with cleft palate: A critical review of the literature. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 39 (1): 50–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(2002)039<0050:AIISWC>2.0.CO;2

Whitehill, T. L., and Chun, J. C. (2002). Intelligibility and acceptability in speakers with cleft palate. In F. Windsor, M. L. Kelly, and N. Hewlett (Eds), Investigations in Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics, 405–415. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Yorkston, K. M., Beukelman, D. R., Strand, E. A., and Bell, K. R. (1999). Management of Motor Speech Disorders in Children and Adults (2nd ed.), 618. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email: [email protected]