Frequency of Input: An Analysis at the Macro and Micro-levels of Learning Italian

doi:10.1558/isla.36273

Instructed Second Language Acquisition, Vol 3, No 1 (2019)

Frequency of Input: An Analysis at the Macro and Micro-levels of Learning Italian

Justin P. White, Alessia Martini

Issued Date: 15 Apr 2019

Abstract

The present paper examines the effect of input at the macro- and micro-levels on beginning level language learners of Italian. At the macro-level, learners are exposed to Structured Input activities targeting Italian accusative clitics to determine their effect on learners' default processing strategies. At the microlevel, the effect of the number of target item tokens in the input is measured and subsequently compared: 40 and 80 tokens. This study included pre-test, immediate post-test and delayed post-test measures on interpretation and production to examine the effect of Structured Input activities. Findings reveal that Structured Input activities at varying token frequencies may affect learners' processing related to this target form as evidenced by their gains in interpretation, as well as their adoption of a 'second noun strategy' in which they overextend their altered processing strategy. As such, we discuss the theoretical and pedagogical ramifications of these findings.

Download Media

PDF Subscribers Only

DOI: 10.1558/isla.36273

References

Benati, A. G. (2001). A comparative study of the effects of processing instruction and output-based instruction on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. Language Teaching Research, 5, 95-127.

Benati, A. (2004). The effects of structured input activities and explicit information on the acquisition of Italian future tense. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 211-230). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Benati, A., & Lee, J. F. (2008). Grammar acquisition and processing instruction: Secondary and cumulative effects. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Fernández, C. (2008). Reexamining the role of explicit information in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 277-305.

Lee, J. F., & Benati, A. G. (2007). Second language processing: An analysis of theory, problems, and possible solutions. New York: Continuum.

Leeser, M. J., & DeMil, A. (2013). Investigating the secondary effects of processing instruction in Spanish: From instruction on accusative clitics to Transfer-of-Training effects on dative clitics. Hispania 96, 748-762.

Morgan-Short, K., & Bowden, H. W. (2006). Processing instruction and meaningful output-based instruction: Effects on second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 31-65.

Sanz, C., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). Positive evidence versus explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer-assisted study. Language Learning, 53, 35-78.

Van Patten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and

research. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.

VanPatten, B. (2004). Several reflections on why there is good reason to continue researching the effects of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.) Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 329-340). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

VanPatten, B. (2007a). Input processing in adult second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 115-135). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Input processing and second language acquisition: A role for instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 45-57.

VanPatten, B., & Fernández, C. (2004). The long-term effects of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing Instruction: Theory, research and commentary, (pp. 273-289). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

VanPatten, B., & Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495-510.

VanPatten, B., & Sanz, C. (1995). From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F. R. Eckman, D. Highland, P. W. Lee, J. Milham & R. R. Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy, (pp. 169-185). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

VanPatten, B., & Wong, W. (2004). Processing instruction and the French causative: Another replication. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing Instruction: Theory, research and commentary, (pp. 97-118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

White, J. P. (2015a). The Effect of Input-based Activity Type on the Acquisition of the Spanish Accusative Clitics. Hispania, 98, 264-284.

White, J. P. (2015b). Primary and secondary effects of processing instruction on Spanish clitic pronouns.” International Review of Applied Linguistics 53, 151-179.

White, J.P, DeMil, A.J., & Rice, M. (2015c). Traditional instruction and processing instruction: German dative definite articles.“ German as a Foreign Language 16, 1-26.

White, J. P., & DeMil, A. J. (2013). Transfer-of-training in Processing Instruction: The role of Form Related Explicit Information. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35, 519-544.

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email: [email protected]