Frequency of Input: An Analysis at the Macro and Micro-levels of Learning Italian
Abstract
Download Media
PDF Subscribers OnlyDOI: 10.1558/isla.36273
References
Benati, A. G. (2001). A comparative study of the effects of processing instruction and output-based instruction on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. Language Teaching Research, 5, 95-127.
Benati, A. (2004). The effects of structured input activities and explicit information on the acquisition of Italian future tense. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 211-230). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Benati, A., & Lee, J. F. (2008). Grammar acquisition and processing instruction: Secondary and cumulative effects. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Fernández, C. (2008). Reexamining the role of explicit information in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 277-305.
Lee, J. F., & Benati, A. G. (2007). Second language processing: An analysis of theory, problems, and possible solutions. New York: Continuum.
Leeser, M. J., & DeMil, A. (2013). Investigating the secondary effects of processing instruction in Spanish: From instruction on accusative clitics to Transfer-of-Training effects on dative clitics. Hispania 96, 748-762.
Morgan-Short, K., & Bowden, H. W. (2006). Processing instruction and meaningful output-based instruction: Effects on second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 31-65.
Sanz, C., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). Positive evidence versus explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer-assisted study. Language Learning, 53, 35-78.
Van Patten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and
research. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
VanPatten, B. (2004). Several reflections on why there is good reason to continue researching the effects of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.) Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 329-340). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
VanPatten, B. (2007a). Input processing in adult second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 115-135). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Input processing and second language acquisition: A role for instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 45-57.
VanPatten, B., & Fernández, C. (2004). The long-term effects of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing Instruction: Theory, research and commentary, (pp. 273-289). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
VanPatten, B., & Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495-510.
VanPatten, B., & Sanz, C. (1995). From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F. R. Eckman, D. Highland, P. W. Lee, J. Milham & R. R. Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy, (pp. 169-185). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
VanPatten, B., & Wong, W. (2004). Processing instruction and the French causative: Another replication. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing Instruction: Theory, research and commentary, (pp. 97-118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
White, J. P. (2015a). The Effect of Input-based Activity Type on the Acquisition of the Spanish Accusative Clitics. Hispania, 98, 264-284.
White, J. P. (2015b). Primary and secondary effects of processing instruction on Spanish clitic pronouns.” International Review of Applied Linguistics 53, 151-179.
White, J.P, DeMil, A.J., & Rice, M. (2015c). Traditional instruction and processing instruction: German dative definite articles.“ German as a Foreign Language 16, 1-26.
White, J. P., & DeMil, A. J. (2013). Transfer-of-training in Processing Instruction: The role of Form Related Explicit Information. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35, 519-544.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.