The job seeker as a moral category: Categorization, moral judgments and emotions in institutional encounters
Abstract
Download Media
PDF (Price: £17.50 )DOI: 10.1558/japl.26892
References
Arminen, I. (2005) Institutional Interaction: Studies of Talk at Work. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Benarrosh, Y. (2006) Recevoir les chômeurs à l’ANPE. L’institution entre don et contrat. Paris: l’Harmattan.
Bergmann, J. (1992) Veiled morality: Notes on discretion in psychiatry. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, 137–162. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bergmann, J. (1998) Introduction: Morality in discourse. In J. Bergmann and P. Linell (eds) Morality in Discourse. Special issue, Research on Language and Social Interaction 31 (3–4): 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683594
Bonu, B., Mondada, L. and Relieu, M. (1994) Catégorisation: l’approche de H. Sacks. In L. Quéré, B. Fradin and J. Widmer (eds) L’enquête sur les catégories. Raisons pratiques 5: 124–148. Paris: Editions de l;EHESS.
Button, G. (1992) Answers as interactional products: Two sequential practices used in job interviews. Social Psychology Quarterly 50 (2): 160–171. ttps://doi.org/10.2307/2786749
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2009) A sequential approach to affect: The case of ‘disappointment’. In M. Haakana, M. Laakso and J. Lindström (eds) Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions, 94–123. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (eds) (1992) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dubois, V. (1999) La vie au guichet. Relation administrative et traitement de la misère. Paris: Economica.
Dupret, B. (2011 [2006]) Adjudication in Action: An Ethnomethodology of Law, Morality and Justice. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Garfinkel, H. (1996) Ethnomethodology’s program. Social Psychology Quarterly 59 (1): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787116
Goodwin, M. H., Cekaite, A. and Goodwin, C. (2012) Emotion as a stance. In A. Peräkyla and M.-L. Sorjonen (eds) Emotion in Interaction, 16–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.003.0002
Goodwin, M. H. and Goodwin, C. (2000) Emotion within situated activity. In A. Duranti (ed.) Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader, 239–257. Oxford: Blackwell.
Heath, C. (1988) Embarrassment and interactional organization. In P. Drew and A. Wootton (eds) Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, 136–160. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J. and Luff, P. (2010) Video in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Heritage, J. (2005) Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk. In K. Fitch and R. Sanders (eds) Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, 103–147. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Heritage, J. and Sefi, S. (1992) Dilemmas of advice: Aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between Health Visitors and first-time mothers. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, 331–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hochschild, A. R. (2003) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jayyusi, L. (1984) Categorization and the Moral Order. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Jayyusi, L. (1991) Values and moral judgement: Communicative praxis as moral order. In G. Button (ed.) Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences, 227–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lavitry, L. (2012) Le jugement d’employabilité: un nouveau savoir pour gérer les chômeurs? Sociologies Pratiques 24 (1): 53–65. https://doi.org/10.3917/sopr.024.0053
Le Mener, E. (2011) Evaluer des demandes, ou la justesse comme travail invisible. Le cas du 115 de Paris. Ethnographiques.org 23. Available online: http://www.ethnographiques.org/2011/ LeMener
Levinson, S. (1992) Activity types and language. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Llewellyn, N. (2010) On the reflexivity between setting and practice: The recruitment interview. In N. Llewellyn and J. Hindmarsh (eds) Organisation, Interaction and Practice: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, 74–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lynch, M. and Bogen, D. (1997) Lies, recollections and categorical judgements in testimony. In S. Hester and P. Eglin (eds) Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, 99–122. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
Pollner, M. (1979) Explicative transactions: Making and managing meaning in traffic court. In G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, 229–255. New York: Irvington Press.
Pomerantz, A. (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schutz, A. (1971) Common-sense and scientific interpretation of human action, In A. Schutz Collected Papers Volume I: The Problem of Social Reality, 3–47. The Hague: Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.3917/res.144.0225
Velkovska, J. and Zouinar, M. (2007) Interaction visiophonique et formes d’asymétries dans la relation de service. Réseaux 144 (5): 225–264.
Velkovska, J. and Zouinar, M. (2012) Jugements et émotions dans les interactions institutionnelles. Ethnographiques.org 25. Available online: http://www.ethnographiques.org/
2012/Velkovska,Zouinar
Weller, J-M. (1999) L’Etat au guichet. Sociologie cognitive du travail et modernisation administrative des services publics. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.
Wierzbicka, A. (1992) Defining emotion concepts. Cognitive Science 16 (4): 539–581. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1604_4
Zimmerman, D. (1969) Record-keeping and the intake process in a public welfare agency. In S. Wheeler (ed.) On Record: Files and Dossiers in American Life, 319–354. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.